Determining how the gestational changes, including low hemoglobin influence the hba1c and estimated average glucose relationship

Authors

  • Humaira Ahmed DOW UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
  • Prof.Sahar Iqbal Dow International Medical College
  • Dr.Syed Talha Naeem Dow International Medical College
  • Dr.Fouzia Zeeshan Khan Dow International Medical College
  • Dr Uzma Nusrat Dow International Medical College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59736/IJP.22.03.909

Keywords:

Gestational diabetes mellitus, estimated average glucose (eAG), HbA1C, random plasma glucose (rPG), anemia, glycemic control

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Background: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) affects up to 14% of pregnancies globally, with accurate glycemic control critical for preventing adverse outcomes. While HbA1c is a standard marker for long-term glucose control, its reliability in pregnant women with anemia is debated. This study explores the association between anemia and glycemic indicators (Glycosylated hemoglobin HbA1c, Random plasma glucose (rPG), and Estimated average glucose (eAG) in pregnant women with GDM. Additionally, it examined the correlation between average glucose levels or eAG, measured by random plasma glucose rPG, and HbA1C.

Methods: A prospective case-control study was carried out over eight months at the Departments of Chemical Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS). Pregnant women in their second trimester after being diagnosed for GDM through oral glucose tolerance test were classified into anemic (hemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL) and non-anemic groups. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for HbA1c, hemoglobin, and random plasma glucose levels. Data were processed using SPSS (version-26) different variables compared by using independent t-test and correlation analyses at a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results: Mean values for eAG, HbA1C, and rPG were 174.22 ± 24.489 mg/dl, 8.342 ± 1.6152%, and 166.21 ± 21.478 mg/dl, respectively. Anemia was associated with significantly higher HbA1C (p < 0.001), eAG (p < 0.001), and rPG (p = 0.004). A strong positive correlation was observed between eAG and rPG (r = 0.958, p < 0.01), while eAG showed a moderate correlation with HbA1C (r = 0.501, p < 0.01). In contrast, the correlation between HbA1C and rPG was weaker (r = 0.331, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: eAG proved to be a good indicator for assessing glycemic control in pregnant non-anemic women with GDM. Anemia significantly affected glycemic metrics, leading to higher HbA1C and glucose levels.

Author Biographies

  • Prof.Sahar Iqbal, Dow International Medical College

    Professor of pathology at DDRRL ,DIMC,DUHS

  • Dr.Syed Talha Naeem, Dow International Medical College

    Assistant Professor of Pathology DDRRL,DIMC,DUHS

  • Dr.Fouzia Zeeshan Khan, Dow International Medical College

    Assistant Professor Pathology DDRRL,DIMC,DUHS

  • Dr Uzma Nusrat, Dow International Medical College

    Assistant Professor Gyne&Obsterics Dow Ojha Campus

References

McIntyre HD, Catalano P, Zhang C, Desoye G, Mathiesen ER, Damm P. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Jul 11; 5(1):47. Doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0098-8.

Dewi RS, Isfandiari MA, Martini S, Yi-Li C. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asia: a review. Journal of Public Health in Africa. 2023; 14(s2):7.

Modzelewski R, Stefanowicz-Rutkowska MM, Matuszewski W, Bandurska-Stankiewicz EM. Gestational diabetes mellitus—recent literatures review. J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 28; 11(19):5736. Doi: 10.3390/jcm11195736.

Galindo RJ, Aleppo G. Continuous glucose monitoring: The achievement of 100 years of innovation in diabetes technology. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Dec; 170:108502. Doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108502.

Cappon G, Vettoretti M, Sparacino G, Facchinetti A. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors for Diabetes Management: A Review of Technologies and Applications. Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Aug; 43(4):383-97. Doi: 10.4093/dmj.2019.0121.

Wang H, Li N, Chivese T, Werfalli M, Sun H, Yuen L, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: estimation of global and regional gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence for 2021 by International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group’s Criteria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jan; 183:109050. Doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109050.

Yin B, Hu L, Meng X, Wu K, Zhang L, Zhu Y, et al. Association of higher HbA1c within the normal range with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a cross-sectional study. Acta Diabetol. 2021 Aug; 58(8):1081-89. Doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01691-0.

Gyasi-Antwi P, Walker L, Moody C, Okyere S, Salt K, Anang L, et al. Global prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. New American Journal of Medicine. 2020; 1(3):1-10.

Law GR, Gilthorpe MS, Secher AL, Temple R, Bilous R, Mathiesen ER, et al. Translating HbA1c measurements into estimated average glucose values in pregnant women with diabetes. Diabetologia. 2017; 60(4):618-24.

Bozkurt L, Göbl CS, Leitner K, Pacini G, Kautzky-Willer A. HbA1c during early pregnancy reflects beta-cell dysfunction in women developing GDM. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Nov; 8(2):e001751. Doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001751.

Hong JGS, Fadzleeyanna MYN, Omar SZ, Tan PC. HbA1c at term delivery and adverse pregnancy outcome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.2022; 22(1):679.

Noshiro K, Umazume T, Hattori R, Kataoka S, Yamada T, Watari H. Hemoglobin concentration during early pregnancy as an accurate predictor of anemia during late pregnancy. Nutrients. 2022 Feb 17; 14(4):839. Doi: 10.3390/nu14040839.

Klonoff DC. Hemoglobinopathies and hemoglobin A1C in diabetes mellitus. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2020. p. 3-7.

Sriwimol W, Choosongsang P, Choosongsang P, Petkliang W, Treerut P. Associations between HbA1c-derived estimated average glucose and fasting plasma glucose in patients with normal and abnormal hemoglobin patterns. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2022 May; 82(3):192-8. Doi: 10.1080/00365513.2022.2040051.

Sisay M, Edessa D, Ali T, Mekuria AN, Gebrie A. The relationship between advanced glycation end products and gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21; 15(10):e0240382.

Renz PB, Hernandez MK, Camargo JL. Effect of iron supplementation on HbA1c levels in pregnant women with and without anaemia. Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Mar; 478:57-61. Doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.12.028.

Kim HY, Kim J, Noh E, Ahn KH, Cho GJ, Hong SC, Oh MJ, Kim HJ. Pre pregnancy hemoglobin levels and gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. Diabetes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2021 Jan; 171:108608. Doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108608.

Firat A, Katlan DC, Uzunay N. Impact of Iron Deficiency Anemia on Hemoglobin A1C Levels in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Pregnant Women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 51(1):24.

Agbozo F, Abubakari A, Narh C, Jahn A. Accuracy of glycosuria, random blood glucose and risk factors as selective screening tools for gestational diabetes mellitus in comparison with universal diagnosing. BMJ Open Diab Res Care. 2018; 6(1):e000493.

Hashimoto K, Koga M. Influence of iron deficiency on HbA1c levels in pregnant women: comparison with non-pregnant women. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7(2), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7020034

Coban E,Ozdogan M,Timuragaoglu A. Effect of iron deficiency anemia on levels of hemoglobin A1c in nondiabetic patients. Acta haematologica. 2004; 112(3):126-8.

Firat A, Katlan DC, Uzunay N. Impact of Iron Deficiency Anemia on Hemoglobin A1c Levels in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Pregnant Women. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2024 jan 22; 51(1):24.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-18

How to Cite

1.
Ahmed H, Iqbal SI, same STN, same FZK, same UN. Determining how the gestational changes, including low hemoglobin influence the hba1c and estimated average glucose relationship. Int J Pathol [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 18 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];22(3):125-32. Available from: https://jpathology.com/index.php/OJS/article/view/909