Comparison of Routine and Concentration Techniques on Microscopic Examination of Stool for Parasitic Ova & Cysts
Keywords:
Stool Concentration techniques, Parasites, Ova,, Cyst, Flotation, Sedimentation techniqueAbstract
Objective: To compare the routine and concentration techniques on microscopic examination of stool for
parasitic ova and cysts to emphasize importance of concentration technique
Methods: A descriptive study of 100 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who attended the Microbiology
Lab, Pathology Department, Family Hospital, Rawalpindi a teaching hospital affiliated with Rawalpindi Medical
College were studied for six months for stool examination. Three samples from each case at three different days
were selected not necessarily consecutive. Three techniques were applied on all samples which included direct
microscopic examination by using saline and iodine preparations and the microscopic examination after using
two concentration techniques which included simple salt flotation technique and Formal-ether concentration
technique.
Results: In routine technique 4% of patients were positive for ova/cysts. In saturated saline floatation technique
8% of patients were positive for ova/cysts of parasites. In formal ether sedimentation technique also 8%of
patients were positive.
Conclusion: Concentration techniques (formal-ether sedimentation and saturated salt floatation) significantly
improved the sensitivity from 4% to 8% for detection of ova/cysts of parasites as compared to routine iodine
preparation technique. Although concentration techniques are well known, these need to be implemented in
those laboratories where these are not used.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Muhammad Wajahat, Maryum Sharif, Hajra Farooq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purpose. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.