Early outcomes of open laminectomy with discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation

Authors

  • Muhammad Nasir Khan Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3126-5577
  • Shahid Ayub Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ali Noman Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2435-2821
  • Imran Khan Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan
  • Sajid Razaq Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan
  • Musab Umair Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59736/IJP.24.03.1116

Keywords:

Diskectomy, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Laminectomy, Pain Measurement, Radiculopathy, Recovery of Function, Treatment Outcome

Abstract

Background: Lumbar disc herniation is a common cause of lumbosacral radiculopathy and functional disability. Although minimally invasive techniques are increasingly used, open laminectomy with discectomy remains common technique in resource-limited settings. Data on early postoperative outcomes are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful pain relief and functional improvement one month after open laminectomy with discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation.

Methods: This descriptive study was conducted at Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from February to May 2026. 127 patients aged 18–60 years with MRI-confirmed single-level lumbar disc herniation refractory to conservative treatment were enrolled consecutively and underwent open laminectomy with discectomy. Pain and disability were assessed preoperatively and at one month follow-up using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a ≥30% reduction in VAS and a ≥15-point reduction in ODI. Early postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: The mean age was 42.8 ± 9.7 years; 59.8% were male and 40.2% female. Mean VAS decreased from 7.9 ± 1.1 preoperatively to 2.3 ± 1.4 at one month, representing a 70.9% reduction (p <0.001). Mean ODI decreased from 56.4 ± 11.8 to 21.7 ± 9.5, representing a 61.5% improvement (p <0.001). Overall, 93 patients (73.2%; 95% CI: 64.9–80.2%) achieved clinically meaningful improvement. Early complications occurred in 9 patients (7.1%), including wound infection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, recurrent disc herniation, and transient neurological deterioration. No mortality or permanent neurological deficits occurred.

Conclusion: Open laminectomy with discectomy produced substantial early improvement in pain and functional disability, with a low frequency of early postoperative complications. It remains a practical treatment option for single-level lumbar disc herniation in resource-limited settings.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Nasir Khan, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

    PGR Department of Neurosurgery

  • Shahid Ayub, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan

    HOD Neurosurgery

  • Muhammad Ali Noman, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan

    Associate Professor Neurosurgery

  • Imran Khan, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan

    Assistant Professor Neurosurgery

  • Sajid Razaq, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan

    Registrar Neurosurgery

  • Musab Umair, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan

    PGR Neurosurgery

References

Kögl N, Petr O, Löscher W, Liljenqvist U, Thomé C. Lumbar disc herniation—the significance of symptom duration for the indication for surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024;121(13):440-8. doi:10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0074.

GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-22. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.

Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Rothman SLG, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J. 2014;14(11):2525-45.

doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.022.

Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine. 1983;8(2):131-40.

Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(18):1763-72. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1512658.

Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934;211(5):210-15. doi:10.1056/NEJM193408022110506.

Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Neurosurg. 1977; 4:74-80. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-66578-3_15.

Yasargil MG. Microsurgical operation of herniated lumbar disc. Adv Neurosurg. 1977; 4:81-85. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-66578-3_16.

Hammed A, Al-Qiami A, Alsalhi H, Almansi A, Massoud M, Alzawahreh A, et al. Surgical vs conservative management of chronic sciatica (>3 months) due to lumbar disc herniation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2024;16(5): e59617. doi:10.7759/cureus.59617.

Echt M, Holland R, Mowrey W, Cezayirli P, De la Garza Ramos R, Hamad M, et al. Surgical outcomes for upper lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global SpineJ.2021;11(5):802-13. doi:10.1177/2192568220941815.

Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson ANA, Blood EA, Abdu WA, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA.2006;296(20):2441-50. doi:10.1001/jama.296.20.2441.

Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson ANA, Blood EA, Abdu WA, et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(25):2789-2800. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f4.

Golubović J, Jelača B, Rodić D, et al. Spontaneous resorption of lumbar disc herniation: a narrative review of pathophysiology, predictive factors, and clinical decision-making. NeuroSci. 2026;7(2):30. doi:10.3390/neurosci7020030.

Toader C, Bratu BG, Covache-Busuioc RA, Glavan LA, Serban M, Ciurea AV. Lumbar disc herniation: from epidemiology and neuroimaging to operatory management and postoperative complications. Rom Neurosurg. 2024;38(2):139-48.

doi:10.33962/roneuro-2024-025.

Vangen-Lønne V, Solberg TK, Nygaard ØP, et al. Surgery for lumbar disc herniation: factors associated with postoperative outcomes in a multicenter registry study. World Neurosurg. 2020;137: e154-e161.

Benzakour T, Igoumenou V, Mavrogenis AF, Benzakour A. Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation. Int Orthop. 2019;43(4):841-51. doi:10.1007/s00264-018-4247-6.

Penchev P, Ilyov IG, Todorov T, Petrov PP, Traykov P. Comprehensive analysis of treatment approaches for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(8): e67899. doi:10.7759/cureus.67899.

Dydyk AM, Massa RN, Mesfin FB. Lumbar disc herniation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.

Ke T, He Q, Wang Q, Li L, Shi C, Zeng J, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between unilateral biportal endoscopic technique and open microdiscectomy in patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation: a single-center retrospective study in China. Asian Spine J. 2025;19(4):600-08. doi:10.31616/asj.2024.0002.

Yang YF, Yu JC, Zhu ZW, Li YW, Xiao Z, Zhi CG, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and cost-utility between unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective matched controlled study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19:755. doi:10.1186/s13018-024-05231-8.

Rajadurai J, Gong H, Gambhir S, Li Y. Comparison of outcomes in open and full endoscopic lumbar discectomies for treating lumbar radiculopathy in an Australian cohort. J Spine Surg. 2025;11(1):24-32. doi:10.21037/jss-24-116.

Ambrosio L, Vadalà G, De Rinaldis E, Muthu S, Čorluka S, Buser Z, et al. Discectomy versus sequestrectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2025;25(2):211-26. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.007.

Gabrovsky N, Petrov M, Kotceva Y, Petrova Y. Outcome measurements in patients with a lumbar disc herniation: a scoping review. Brain Spine. 2025; 5:104380. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104380.

Low WX, Sehmbi A, Shabani F, Shetty N, Mohammad S, Mohammad HR. The effect of symptom duration on the outcomes of lumbar discectomy for radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2025;34(9):3996-4009. doi:10.1007/s00586-025-08912-y.

Elsayed AEM, Alghamdi AA. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review. Rev Diabet Stud. 2025;21:516-25.

Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, et al. Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg. 2002;96(1 Suppl):34-44.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-09

Issue

Section

Original article

How to Cite

1.
Khan MN, Ayub S, Noman MA, Khan I, Razaq S, Umair M. Early outcomes of open laminectomy with discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation. Int J Pathol [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 9 [cited 2026 Oct. 10];24(3):415-2. Available from: https://jpathology.com/index.php/OJS/article/view/1116