Evaluation of treatment modalities for congenital ptosis

indications, techniques, and long-term outcomes

Authors

  • Afza Qadir Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan
  • Naz Ullah Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan
  • Aleena Khan Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ashraf Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan
  • Noor Ul Hussain Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59736/IJP.23.04.995

Keywords:

Congenital Ptosis, Conjoint Fascial Sheath, Frontalis Suspension, Levator Resection, Pediatric Oculoplasty

Abstract

Background: Congenital ptosis, characterized by drooping of the upper eyelid present at birth, can adversely affect visual development and facial appearance. Timely surgical correction is essential to prevent amblyopia, maintain a clear visual axis, and achieve satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes. Our objective is to evaluate the indications, surgical procedure, and results of different methods of surgery in congenital ptosis on long-term follow-up.

Methods: This Prospective observational study was carried out over a span of 4 years, January 2021 to December 2024), in Ophthalmology department, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. This study included 38 patients aged 3 to 18 years with simple congenital ptosis. Preoperative assessment included the levator function, MRD1, the palpebral fissure height, Bell's phenomenon, and visual acuity. The patients underwent frontalis suspension, levator resection, and/or conjoint fascial sheath (CFS) sling according to levator function and ptosis degree. Results: In the preoperative period, the average MRD 1 was 0.7 ± 0.5 mm and it was significantly increased to 3.1 ± 0.6 mm postoperatively (p < 0.001). Frontalis suspension was carried out in 24 patients, levator resection in 15, and CFS suspension in 5. Overall, 86.4% of patients had eyelids (≤1 mm asymmetry), and the best results were found in the CFS group. Recurrence was observed in 9.1%, predominantly in the frontalis suspension group. Lagophthalmos was observed in 25% of subjects, with predominance of mild forms.

Conclusion: Conjoint fascial sheath suspension with or without levator advancement is a safe and effective, less morbid approximation to frontalis suspension in certain types of congenital ptosis, particularly in patients with fair to good levator function. It results in improved eyelid symmetry, less complications and better patient satisfaction.

Author Biographies

  • Afza Qadir, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

    Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology

  • Aleena Khan, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

    Orbit and Oculoplastics Department

  • Muhammad Ashraf, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

    Pediatric Ophthalmology Department

  • Noor Ul Hussain, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

    Pediatric Ophthalmology

References

Chen L, Li J, Zhang C, Li Y, Hou L, Ma J. Surgical interventions for congenital ptosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(5):1859-69. doi:10.1007/s00266-023-03360-9

Chen YH, Huang PW, Tsai YJ. Factors related to persistent amblyopia after surgical correction in unilateral congenital blepharoptosis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25:330. doi:10.1186/s12886-025-04169-7

Wu X, Zhang J, Ding X, Cao Y, Zhu X, Li R, et al. Amblyopia and refractive status in congenital ptosis: the effect and timing of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;87(1):49-53.

Li J, Yu X, Wang K, Meng Z, Liang X, Chen R. Modified conjoint fascial sheath and levator muscle complex suspension for the correction of simple severe congenital ptosis in pediatrics and the effect on refractive status. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;40(4):392-8. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000002589

Sang P, Fang M, Li X, et al. Treatment of severe ptosis by conjoint fascial sheath suspension. Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:1837458.

Gandhi A, Mehta A, Naik M. Does frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis change the corneal topography and refractive characteristics postoperatively? Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14:3667–73.

Hoshikawa R, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, et al. Prediction of distance visual acuity in presbyopic astigmatic subjects. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:6958.

Wuthisiri W, Peou C, Lekskul A, et al. Maximal levator resection beyond Whitnall’s ligament in severe simple congenital ptosis with poor levator function. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022; 16:441–52.

Tan Y, Wang X, Fu J, et al. Amblyopic astigmatism characteristics and surgical outcomes in younger children with severe congenital ptosis after frontalis suspension surgery. BMC Ophthalmol.2023; 23:54.

Owji N, Khalili MR, Bazrafkan H, Heydari M. Long-term outcome of refractive errors in patients with congenital blepharoptosis whohaveundergoneptosissurgery.ClinExpOptom.2022;105(7):715-20. doi:10.1080/08164622.2021.1973344

Ghiam BK, Su RC, Orge F. Surgical outcomes after frontalis suspension using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sling for congenital ptosis. Cureus. 2023;15(11): e49020. doi:10.7759/cureus.49020

Evereklioglu C. Frontalis suspension by a minimally invasive "harvesting-stripping technique" for congenital blepharoptosis in children under 3-years-old. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023; 33:161–70. doi:10.1177/11206721221106133

Kasaee A, Aliabadi M, Najafi L, Jamshidian-Tehrani M. Severe unilateral congenital ptosis with poor levator function: tarsoconjunctival mullerectomy plus levator resection vs frontalis sling procedure. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(8):1254-60. doi:10.18240/ijo.2022.08.05

Dallalzadeh LO, Park KS, Korn BS, Kikkawa DO, Liu CY. Minimal dissection direct frontalis muscle advancement flap for congenital ptosis repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(7):2358–61. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007761

Liu NH, He AJ, Wu D, Zhang J, Song N. Modified maximal levator palpebrae superioris shortening in correcting congenital severe ptosis in children. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;87(5):523–7. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002867

Mohammed NM, Kamal MA, Abdelhafez MA, Diab MM. Single-triangle versus Fox pentagon frontalis suspension for unilateral severe congenital ptosis correction. J AAPOS. 2020;24(5): 295.e1–295.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.011

Rosenberg JB, Andersen J, Barmettler A. Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD012725. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012725

Salamah M, Eid AM, Albialy H, Sharaf El Deen S. Anterior approach levator plication for congenital ptosis, absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021; 1:2–3.

Théra JP, Tiama JM, Konipo A, Napo A, Bamani S. Treatment of congenital ptosis in a low-income country: polypropylene frontalis sling at the African Institute of Tropical Ophthalmology. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020;43(2):123–7.

Shome D, Mittal ST, Kapoor R. Effect of eyelid crease formation on aesthetic outcomes post frontalis suspension for unilateral ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(1): e2039.

Ding F, Zhu X, Yang L. Treatment of mild and moderate congenital ptosis via the levator imbrication technique. Chin J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;5(4):173–7.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Original article

How to Cite

1.
Qadir A, Ullah N, Khan A, Ashraf M, Hussain NU. Evaluation of treatment modalities for congenital ptosis: indications, techniques, and long-term outcomes. Int J Pathol [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 Dec. 31];23(4):281-9. Available from: https://jpathology.com/index.php/OJS/article/view/995