Outcome of pneumatic lithotripsy versus holmium laser in distal ureteric stones
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59736/IJP.23.04.1007Keywords:
Distal ureteric stones, Holmium laser lithotripsy, Pneumatic lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy, Stone-free rateAbstract
Background: The prevalence of distal ureteric stones (DUS) is a serious urological disease having a high morbidity. Pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) and holmium laser lithotripsy (HL) are popular modalities of treatment with HL usually reported to have superior results albeit at increased cost. This study aims at comparing the safety and efficacy of HL and PL in the management of DUS.
Methods: This observational comparative study was conducted at Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi, from Feb to September 2025, including 160 patients of DUS (<2 cm) schedule for either procedure was enrolled and divided in HL or PL, each consists of 80 individuals. One-month stone-free status were analyzed through SPSS-27, with p≤0.05 considered significant.
Results: Groups were compared at baseline regarding age (55.9 ± 11.7 vs. 57.7 ± 10.5 years, p=0.72), gender (p=0.07), BMI (p=0.64), comorbidities, and stone size (p=0.18). Operative time was similar (47.4 ± 2.6 vs. 43.1 ± 4.2 min, p=0.58). HL resulted in significantly lower postoperative pain scores (VAS 3.3 ± 1.2 vs. 6.6 ± 1.5, p<0.001), shorter hospital stays (<24h: 85% vs. 56.3%, p<0.001), and higher stone-free rates at one month (97.3% vs. 79.4%, p<0.001). Intraoperative hemorrhage (p=0.12), ureteral injury (p=0.56), fever (p=0.24), and infection (p=0.14) were infrequent and not significantly different.
Conclusion: HL provides superior efficacy, reduced pain, and shorter hospitalization compared to PL, while maintaining comparable safety. However, PL remains a feasible option in resource-limited settings.
References
Glazer K, Brea IJ, Leslie SW, Vaitla P. Ureterolithiasis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 [cited 2025 May 12]. Available from: StatPearls Publishing.
Singh RP, Mishra A, Chandel SS, Agarwal M, Chawra HS, Singh M, et al. Unlocking new approaches to urolithiasis management via nutraceuticals. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2024;25(9):1124–31. doi:10.2174/0113892010248721230921093208.
Halinski A, Bhatti KH, Boeri L, Cloutier J, Davidoff K, Elqady A, et al. Stone composition of renal stone formers from different global regions. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021;93(3):307–12. doi:10.4081/aiua.2021.3.307.
Waqas M, Khan ZA, Ahmad S, Akbar S, Khalid N. Risk factors of kidney stones in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2024;16(6): e11320. doi:10.7759/cureus.63080.
Baowaidan F, Zugail AS, Lyoubi Y, Culty T, Lebdai S, Brassart E, et al. Incidence and risk factors for urolithiasis recurrence after endourological management of kidney stones: a retrospective single-centre study. Prog Urol. 2022;32(8–9):601–7. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.02.010.
Ambardekar R, Dhangar SP, Syed AA, Vaidya S, Shengal M. The effective medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteric stones. Arch Pharm Pract. 2022;13(4):92–6. doi:10.51847/UygHWTyiZ3.
Allam EA. Urolithiasis unveiled: pathophysiology, stone dynamics, types, and inhibitory mechanisms: a review. Afr J Urol. 2024;30(1):34–9. doi:10.1186/s12301-024-00436
Altaee ZM, Ayyed AA, Wadullah R. Influence of stone location on rate of stone clearance and complications for holmium laser lithotripsy. J Am Urol. 2023;22(4):412–8. doi: 10.33545/26646617.2024.v6.i1b.38.
Segall M, Mousavi A, Eisner BH, Scotland K. Pharmacologic treatment of kidney stones: current medication and pH monitoring. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2024;48(1):11–8. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.11.008.
Wu CF, Shee JJ, Lin WY, Lin CL, Chen CS. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones. J Urol. 2004;172(5):1899–902. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000142848. 43880.b3.
Sharma S, Sabale V, Satav V, Mulay A. To evaluate the impact of Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteroscopic removal of proximal and distal ureter calculi. Cureus. 2023;15(10): e42132. doi:10.7759/cureus.47498.
Rashid AO, Attar A, Mohammed KS, Fakhralddin SS, Abdulla LN, Buchholz N. Direct comparison of pneumatic and Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy in the management of lower ureteric stones. Urol Int. 2020;104(9–10):765–8. doi:10.1159/000508419.
Shah RS, Shrestha N. Efficacy of laser vs pneumatic lithotripsy for mid and distal ureteric stone: a comparative study. J Nepalgunj Med Coll. 2022;20(1):16–9. doi:10.3126/jngmc. v20i1.48154.
Arvind A, Dutta SM, Singh SK, Mondal PP, Tewary SK, Agarwal A, et al. Efficacy of holmium laser versus pneumatic lithotripsy for mid and distal ureteric stones above 10 mm size. Asian J Med Sci. 2025;16(5):115–9. doi:10.71152/ajms. v16i5.4475.
Jadhav R, Ng T, Raykar R, Mahadik S. Comparison of laser and pneumatic lithotripsy for mid and lower ureteral stones: an analytical review at a tertiary care center. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2024;17(11):157–60. doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i11.52127.
Ejaz M, Saulat S, Qadri SS, Ayub A. Comparison of outcomes of pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy, holmium laser lithotripsy, and combined electromagnetic with ultrasonic lithotripsy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2023;73(6):1725. doi:10.51253/pafmj. v73i6.8856.
Ansari W, Dhakal P, Bogati AS. Role of ureteric DJ stenting following ureteroscopic removal of stone with pneumatic lithoclast for mid and lower ureter stones. Nepal Med Coll J. 2024;26(4):290–5. doi:10.3126/nmcj. v26i4.74457.
Hassan A, Shakil O, Yousaf MH, Hussain QM, Haider A, Iqbal H. Comparison of outcomes of stenting versus non-stenting in patients undergoing laser lithotripsy for ureteric calculi. Biol Clin Sci Res J. 2024;2024(1):1129. doi:10.54112/bcsrj. v2024i1.1129.
Asif M, Khattak JJ, Khan Z, Anwar K, Bibi R. Ureteric stones less than 1.5 cm: comparison of laser vs pneumatic lithotripsy—a single center study. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2023;17(5):175. doi:10.53350/pjmhs2023175175.
Kittaweerat N, Buaban K, Tansakul P. Postoperative infection after ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy in Songkhla Hospital. Insight Urol. 2023;44(2):68–74. doi:10.52786/isu.a.74.
Giyasov SI, Rakhimbaev AA, Ziyayev IB. Comprehensive comparative assessment of the results of treatment of patients with ureteral stones using two different methods. Urologiia. 2024;22(1):49–55. doi:10.18565/urology.2024.1.49-55.
He JW. Holmium laser lithotripsy and analysis of factors influencing postoperative ureteral stricture. Urologiia. 2023;21(4):233–8. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3099962/v1.
Para SA, Wani MS, Hamid A, Malik SA, Khawaja AR, Mehdi S. Incidence of ureteric strictures following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: holmium: YAG versus thulium fiber laser. Urol Res Pract. 2023;49(3):198. doi:10.5152/tud.2023.22264.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafat Rasheed, Haroon Sabir khan , Muhammad Tanveer Sajid, Syed Yazdan Haider, Badar Murtaza, Nubair Sarwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purpose. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
